The PCA and female deaconesses

September 16, 2008

Of course the writers on this site have stated the biblical position that scripture does not allow women to lead and exercise authority over men in the church. Our view is well known.

A PCA pastor who goes by “rattlesnake6″ has begun a series on the subject of deaconesses in the PCA. Whether you agree with him or not, you should read his well written posts. Here is an excerpt, speaking about why the issue has come to the attention of our denomination in the first place:

Why were the questions raised and did they come primarily from disgruntled men and women in the various PCA congregations or did they come from pastors? That is an important distinction to make. If the men and women in the PCA are clamoring for deaconesses, then that is one problem; if the men and women in the PCA are not, in general calling for deaconesses, then the question is: Why are some PCA pastors pushing so hard for deaconesses? Moreover, what are the implications and applications of “commissioning” men and women as deacons? What kind of animal is that? Who thought that up? Such wording very much looks like a sleight of hand or an attempted “end run” around what is so patently clear in the BCO.

He goes on to ask, “Are women in the PCA unhappy and being spiritually abused being by PCA men?” He answers:

 

As I listen to the stories via the Internet I keep hearing something very, very different not only with a view to my home congregation in Southern California, but in my entire pastoral experience in Holland, Canada, and my native United States. Have there been insensitive men in those congregations? Yes, but I’ve also met my share of insensitive women as well. Have there been men who were linguine-spined? Yes, but there were a few pushy women as well, who acted like they had a chip on their shoulders all the time; in fact, they did.

I must admit that there has been a recurring complaint that I have heard from women in those congregations. It is not that their husband is a tyrant and uses them as a doormat and it is not that they desire to be an office bearer in the church. The number one complaint, far and away, is that their husbands do not lead them spiritually. This is a matter that deserves our full attention, because the husbands of these wives are being derelict in their duties. The remedy, however, is not to attempt to make women feel important or accepted, especially when this involves stepping outside of what Scripture teaches, but rather it is to admonish, encourage, and aid the men in becoming spiritual leaders in their homes. To my way of thinking, this is the task that confronts the PCA today and that needs to be taken seriously. There is a two-pronged negative attack on the PCA: First, there are pastors who are pushing to have women be commissioned as deacons. These pastors are violating their word if they have changed their views and their Presbyteries are violating the PCA BCO if they are allowing/tolerating such an unconstitutional practice. There are church orderly ways to accomplish changes in theBCO. Let the pastors follow those procedures. If they fail to achieve what they desire in terms of changes, then their choices are to stay in the PCA and conform to what they promised or to leave. It really is that simple.

Second, rather than spending time apologizing for what Scripture says, it will behoove PCA pastors to apply themselves to teaching their men to be biblical leaders in their homes and showing the women from Scripture what God requires of them. Who is the Lord that we should worship him? Looking to Scripture to be informed about the nature and character of God will do more to put things in perspective for both men and women than trying to get women to be allowed to do something the God of Scripture does not permit. We’ll continue to look at this, Lord willing, next time.

Great arguments in rattlesnake’s post. Read it here.

3 Responses to “The PCA and female deaconesses”


  1. I read these a while back. They are very well done.


  2. The appointment of “Deborah” was not a good reflection on the men who refused to lead. I agree that there is much of this kind of reasoning going on…(the men won’t lead, so someone has to stand up)…too much of male-pattern cowardice going on in the Church today…(that’s a given).

    But- the answer is not
    1. to abdicate the Biblical position.
    2. succumb to the inevitable (women must lead since men won’t).

    The other thing that bothers me is the fact that the BCO is very clear. Have we in the PCA come to the point where we don’t care what the BCO says? I think the argument of women deacons is the cart before the horse. If someone in good conscience (in the PCA) truly believes in women deacons, then they must do one of two things: (leave the PCA) or (fight to change the BCO). They must not go against the BCO. If they do they should be disciplined for doing so. I personally am complementarian. I realize however that many good men and women disagree. That is fine, but they should understand that the women deacons issue is the cart, and the wording of the BCO is the horse. Change that first, or find another denomination. That would be more in keeping with doing all things decently and in order. To fight first for women deacons is not the issue at the moment in the PCA, or it shouldn’t be. That has already been decided. The issue is observance of the BCO. Otherwise vows…are mere words.

    Gage Browning
    Post Tenebras Lux

  3. Les Prouty Says:

    Jay, thanks. Agree.

    Gage, agree too. They should either honestly line up under our standards of line up in another hipper denomination.


Leave a Reply