for the recovery and propagation of the faith of the reformation

Blue Like Jazz’s Donald Miller

In Bad Theology, Deaconesses?, Democratic Voters, Democrats, Emerg***, Emergent, Emerging, Emerging Church, Feminism, Global Alarming, Liberalism, Naive Christians, Obama, PCA, Postmodernism, Relativism, Social Gospel, evanjellicals on July 7, 2009 at 6:00 am

This GREAT post by Rattlesnake slipped by me back in June. He has another installment coming soon, so why not catch up on the first post: The Arrival of the Evangelical Left: Poster Boys and Liberal Theologians. Here’s a taste:

Blue Like Jazz is The Shack lite. Well, maybe not quite that bad, but it is truly a pitiful apologetic for the Christian faith. What rubs salt in the wound is the fact that Campus Crusade for Christ spent a ton of money placing copies of BLJ in the packets for incoming freshmen on college campuses.

In case you missed the invocation at the 2008 Democratic Convention, it was delivered by Miller, who also actively campaigned for Mr. O’Bama. Some might be asking themselves why a Christian would actively campaign for a man who has a 100% approval rating from Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and every other pro-abortion group on the planet. That’s a good question. Miller’s reply, according to Tooley’s article went like this: “Barack is the only candidate willing to talk about his faith in Jesus.” It must be nice to be on a first name basis with the President. It still remains a mystery to some of us how Mr. O’Bama could sit for twenty years under the preaching of Rev. Jeremiah Wright and not know that the man is an advocate of the kind of “liberation theology” that liberates no one because it is Marxist. Rev. Wright parrots James Cone and Gustavo Gutierrez. It is also a bit of an enigma why the President has not found time to attend worship since his inauguration. He must be too busy talking about his faith. As a matter of fact, those of us on the Right—as well as those on the Left—would be hard pressed to indicate when Mr. O’Bama has made serious reference to his faith since being in office.

[Miller] now attends a “socially conscious church in Seattle.” Ah! There are the magic words: socially conscious. Of course, any student of history and of the Reformation will tell you that the Reformers were very socially conscious and had scriptural reasons why they were that way. The early Puritans built universities (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and a host of others), hospitals, orphanages, as well as providing for the poor and needy. So exactly what kind of social consciousness is Miller talking about? In all likelihood, it’s the Social Gospel nonsense of Jim Wallis, Brian McLaren, and other Emergent church movement gurus. Reading Wallis’s and McLaren’s “ethics” books, you have to laugh and wonder if anyone takes the slipshod or non-existent exegesis they pretend to do seriously. Apparently, Miller does.

Oh, and Rattlesnake tackles the idiocy of the attempt to at the last PCA GA to saddle us with deaconesses. This post is a must read!

  1. Why do so many “Christians” do the “yes, but” routine on books like these? You know…”well, I knkow his treatment of God is shabby/heretical/etc but…God is using this book in many lives”. Really? I heard Erwin Lutzer actually say that! God uses heretical stuff to honor His name? Go figure.

  2. It seems like the “yes, but” argument is similar to “I only buy Playboy for the articles.”